The Amazing Spiderman 2: Second Trailer

Excuse the language but holy shit have you seen the latest Spiderman trailer? Following the Electro advertised teaser we all saw a few months back, the official trailer is here and my god it makes me think why I would ever wish Marvel to go on holiday for a while...okay The Avengers was something special); as was The Amazing Spiderman (2012). 

I am going to go out on a limb here and say, and while it is still early days, this might be the best Marvel superhero blockbuster since The Avengers (2012). 

Jackass presents: Bad Grandpa

Genre: Comedy
Director: Jeff Tremain
Starring: Johnny Knoxville and Jackson Nicoll
Running: 92mins

As Jackass 3D came to an end in 2010 it felt like the right time, and while the 3D concept was well orchestrated and hilariously professional, the 3D premise was not much of a comedic step up from its predecessors. Three years on, Johnny Knoxville returns with Bad Grandpa; a Borat style mockery of gullible America with a surprisingly relevant but extremely brief story line. 

Irving Zisman (Knoxville) finds himself in an unexpected situation following the death of his wife. Excited at the prospect of dabbling in American women, he is approached by toward the end of a hilariously disturbing mass dedicated to his wife's recent passing. Irving is left with no choice but to consider his morals, and more importantly, his family, and agrees to take grandson Billy halfway across America to his uncommitted father. 

The loose plot in Bad Grandpa is wonderfully connected to the pranks that follow along the way as each pit-stop is met with the intention of distracting the people around them in comedic and at times disturbing fashion. Both Knoxville and sidekick Billy are ambitious from the start, holding no punches as they gate crash a wedding, destroy a local diner, flirt with women and the climatic build up of the beauty pageant in a fantastic scene that the trailer so stupidly reveals. However there is a lot more involved, as the sleazy 86 year old brings back some Jackass related moments such as robbing supermarkets, and potential fistfights with controversial moments involving racism and homophobia. 

The chemistry between Knoxville and child star Jason Nicoll is a treat, with Nicoll's stone faced impressions proving gutsy in some terrifying situations; he is well mentored by Knoxville as he is clearly obliged to escalate further havoc to the finest and strangest parts of America. 

Just like the previous Jackass movies, Bad Grandpa is short and may leave you wanting more. Bad Grandpa seems inspired by Sacha Baron Cohen's fictionalised plot in Borat. With Knoxville's renowned bravery, this ambitious attempt at shying from Jackass but keeping the bones of its origin pays off even if the trailer did reveal the majority of the hilarious pranks involved. 

BlackFish

Genre: Documentary

Directed: Gabriela Cowperthwaite

Starring: Tilikum, Dave Duffus, Samantha Berge and Dawn Brancheau (archive)

Running: 80mins

Blackfish, directed by Gabriela Cowperthwaite, is a fascinating, terrifying and deeply intriguing insight into the world of "so-called" entertainment, focusing on the ambitious extent that authorities of Seaworld will go through in order to keep it a money spinning attraction. Tilikum is an Orcha Whale raised, like many, in the surroundings of a concrete swimming pool in Florida's renowned tourist attraction Seaworld; a place that fails to advertise the true nature of the Orcha Whale. While friendly, they are considered extremely dangerous, pointing to the obvious nature of the mammal and its survival instinct, oh, an the title "Killer Whale" stands out also. 

The story here is a biased outlook on animal exploitation and begins with footage of Dawn Brancheau; Tilikum's most recent victim and ironically, Seaworld's oldest and much experienced trainer. Her death was tragic but not surprising.

The death of Dawn Brancheau is a clear motive behind Gabriela's Blackfish in which is pieced from the origin of whale hunting, to Seaworld's neighbour "Sealand" while its main focus is on the peculiar and incidentally tragic happenings in both Florida and Spain. Blackfish is not out to please the average Seaworld fan, rather an attempt at opening their eyes. 

The story of the whale is heartfelt and deeply emotional. Blackfish does well in captivating the emotions from former Seaworld instructors, the audience, the attraction and of course, the Whale - in which Tilikum is hailed both hero and villain. 

Blackfish fails to ask "you" the question and rather runs on archive footage, newspaper headlines and tries dividing fact from fiction with Seaworld being widely criticised from the beginning. Blackfish brings a lot of experts to the table, eyewitnesses and solid footage of incidents that are guaranteed to leave you shook. The only specimen it does fail to provide is a perspective from Seaworld representatives and for obvious reasons. So while it falls flat in that area, Gabriela's fascinating insight into the exploitation of Orcha whales is surprising, heartfelt and thoroughly frightening. 

 

Prisoners

Genre: Crime drama

Directed: Denis Villeneuve

Starring: Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Paul Dano, Viola Davis and Terrance Howard.

Running: 153 Mins 

Following a thanksgiving gathering across the street, Keller (Jackman) and friend Franklin (Howard) find themselves calling their daughters names down a wet and windy suburban avenue. Alert of a suspicious van parked outside previously, Keller realises the daunting situation that both Anna and Joy's disappearance is subject to a double kidnapping. 

The streets become ever so lonely and the situation becomes a reality when the local police, including detective Loki (Gyllenhaal) turn up to gather some information regarding the daughters of both families. As Loki digs deeper into the possible characters involved, Keller struggles to maintain his peace, making matters worse for Loki, Franklin and everyone involved. While Loki is adamant and confident in finding the kidnapper, the circumstances become harder to accept with a plot revealing deeper answers as Loki thinks he has found the answer in Alex (Dano), only to unravel some loose ends in an investigation that becomes harder to tie up. 

Prisoners reels you in easily with a story that becomes ever so gripping but to say it is enjoyable may be the wrong word; more interesting and satisfying (in parts), with a gathering of dark scenes that leave a bad aura every time. Director Denis Villeneuve really hits home with this strong, relate-able topic, with its aggressive scenes and terrific performances from the cast, you could say the result is all too real to actually leave the cinema with a fine grin. It supplies a gritty, yet extremely depressive aura similar to that of David Fincher's Zodiac (2007) with its endless discovery moments yet as a member of the audience, it takes you back to square one every time.

The possibility of this happening quickly dawns on you from the beginning as Villeneuve's vision of relating it to factual kidnappings seeming all too real. Prisoners is a frightening tale of some wonderful, disturbing and dedicated characters that refuses any sense of euphoria from the very beginning.  

While Prisoners deserves much applause for its modern vision on a disturbing and quite existing society, Villeneuve assembles a great cast of actors to help create just that. It is one of the most nail biting atmospheric crime dramas of 2013 thus far. 

Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal maybe on the hunt for bragging rights at the Oscars this year, and while Jackman's performance is the most talked about, both men are countered for their own, personnel performances; ones that may stand a chance masterfully at the forth coming Oscars event. 

Prisoners is certainly not the most upbeat crime dramas of the year but its deep intentions are heartfelt. The performances from the all round cast are jaw dropping, with a plot seeking nothing less than sorrow from its audience. 

That's all for now guys, thanks for reading. 

Tarantino on his favourite movies of 2013 (so far)

The Hollywood craftsmanship of Quentin Tarantino needs very little introduction other than he is a full time director, writer and most times, a very in-depth movie critic with rival projects in the past finding that out the hard way. Tarantino is never shy of controversial opinion; while those who once pointed the finger at Quentin's work have in most cases felt the force of powerful and very constructive words from a man who's argumentative persona is felt like a hot knife through butter. Nevertheless, Tarantino is an all round child like movie buff. His work is hailed to be contently successful due to the desire of creating a film that he, as an adolescent, would have liked to pay in to see. 

As you may or may not know, one of Tarantino's favourite movies of all time is Battle Royale (2000). While we would love nothing more than an extended list of enjoyable and somewhat personal list of classic movies from the man who knows best, we are giving his top ten favourite movies of 2013 instead. 

Afternoon Delight

Director/Writer: Jim Soloway

Starring: Kathryn Hahn, Juno Temple and Josh Radnor 

Synopsis: Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) is frustrated at the lack of romantic spark that once embraced the home she shares with lover boy Jeff (Radnor). Desperate to dabble in new experiences, the "stay at home mom" visits a strip club in which she meets McKenna (Temple); a struggling teenager caught up in a life that needs rescuing. Rachel does just that, in granting McKenna the new life of being a nanny to her kids, Rachel believes this is a deed worth pushing. However her selfishness creates tension within the household of others, with husband Jeff finding it difficult to cope around a situation that becomes all too peculiar and unsatisfying as far as his relationship goes with Rachel. 

Before Midnight

Director: Richard Linklater

Starring: Ethan Hawke and Julie Deply 

Synopsis: Jesse (Hawke) and Celine's romance is celebrated over two decades from when they first met. Both are on holiday in Greece, courtesy of an invitation from a former colleague and friend of Jesse's. As the trip comes to an end, Jesse finds himself in limbo, with a once dedication toward Celine hanging in the balance as a relationship that has lasted a lifetime begins to slope. However the surviving friendship and lustful chemistry between both, shows that neither is willing to give up on what they both discovered on a Paris train a lifetime ago. 

Blue Jasmine

Directed: Woody Allen

Starring: Cate Blanchett, Alec Baldwin and Sally Hawkins

Synopsis: New York based socialite Jasmine (Blanchett) is deceived into false love and ultimately left with nothing other than her sister Ginger. While they say family should become first, the depressed mindset of Jasmine quickly becomes a burden to the household of Ginger and her husband Augie (Andrew Dice Clay). 

The Conjuring

Directed: James Wan

Starring: Patrick Wilson, Vera Farmiga and Ron Livingston

Synopsis: Based on the real life work of paranormal investigators Ed (Wilson) and Lorraine (Farmiga), their duty calls on what seems a routine house of haunted ghouls; with the outcome, in most cases, appearing false. However, the experience of both Ed and Lorraine is tested as a family is terrorised in a dilapidated farm house in Rhode Island.

Drinking Buddies

Directed: Joe Swanberg

Starring: Olivia Wilde, Jake Johnson and Anna Kendrick

Synopsis: Luke and Kate spend their days in the Chicago Brewery sober - to a certain extent. But their typical mundane shift can only last so long before they make a routine session of beer drinking. But considering both Luke and Kate are in "not so" convincing relationships, the romantic premise of Drinking Buddies kicks as they are both convinced of their lustful suitability, they know it can never be, or can it? 

Frances Ha

Directed: Noah Baumbach

Starring: Greta Gerwig, Mickey Sumner and Adam Driver

Synopsis: The life of Frances Haliday (Gerwig) is full of wonderful hopes and dreams with optimism in abundance. Frances lives in New York without an actual apartment, and while the only way is up in the eyes of Frances, her friend Sophie is bemused to where exactly she sees her friend going and creates a fallout in friendship. However while Frances continues to live her life with sheer enjoyment, her sudden dawn on reality seems almost inevitable.

Gravity

Directed: Alfonso Cuaron

Starring: George Clooney and Sandra Bullock

Synopsis: Dr. Ryan Stone (Bullock) is in the company of astronaut Matt (Clooney) who are both exploring the wonders of space on its first shuttle mission. Things take a turn for the worse when the shuttle is destroyed, leaving Dr. Ryan and Matt fighting against the daring possibility of being sucked into the abyss forever. 

Kick-Ass 2

Directed: Jeff Wadlow

Starring: Aaron Taylor Johnson, Chloe Grace-Moretz and Jim Carrey

Synopsis: Kick-Ass (Johnson) joins up with a group of self inspired crime fighters in order to maintain the peace. On the other hand, Hit-Girl (Moretz) struggles to come to terms with modern day high school, with her personality outside the costume becoming harder to control. 

The Loan Ranger

Directed: Gore Verbinski

Starring: Johnny Depp, Armie Hammer and William Fichtner

Synopsis: The Loan Ranger, aka the tale of John Reid is told to a young boy in way of enlightening the 1930s. Told through the eyes of a late Tonto (Depp), the movie retraces the origin of John Reid in a spaghetti Western parody that leads both Tonto and Reid through explosive territories and blockbuster adventures; a surviving outcome that grants Reid the title of "The Loan Ranger".

This is the End

Directed: Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen.

Starring: Seth Rogan, James Franco, Jay Baruchek and Craig Robinson.

Synopsis: A gathering of "stoners" and every Seth Rogen cohort you can think of, turn up for James Franco's house warming. Sounds like a lot of fun, especially if you are actually friends with these guys. But unfortunately, a seat in a dark room with a big ass screen is as close as we are going to get to witnessing the adventure of six of the funniest guys in Hollywood (at the moment); Jonah Hill, Seth Rogen, James Franco, Craig Robinson, Danny McBride and Jay Baruchel (Read my full review here).

That's all folks. Thanks for reading. 

Ben Affleck's appointment as Batman a good choice

This is a follow up to the article covered by fellow entertainment writer Paul Saunders of The Journalist.ie.

Okay, let's start by saying that if this was Spiderman, Superman or any other "superhero" of that kind, we would have been so bored by now! You can't browse the internet without bumping into a nerds perspective of why Ben Affleck's appointment is a terrible idea, or, if you click the right button you just might be convinced by someone else on how the vision of Affleck in the bat suit is not a total disaster.

Warner Bros. have accomplished a divide in Batman fans with immediate effect. Believe in me when I tell you, your opinion will not change their decision, and John Roden's opposed petition will do no such damage either.

Before I give my own opinion of why Ben Affleck as Batman could work, let's look at what John Roden is saying to us on Change.org ;"His acting skill is not even close to being believable as Bruce Wayne and he won't do the role justice. He's not intimidating enough for the role of Batman. Batman is someone that strikes fear in the hearts of men. His portrayal of Daredevil was atrocious and he's not remotely close to an action star or a superhero. Please find someone else and deliver to the fans what they want". 

There is only a certain amount of times the average Batman fan can use Affleck's performance in Daredevil (2003) as an excuse to rid him of future comic book movie opportunities. While Daredevil was mediocre, it was not all Ben Afflecks fault, after all the guy is an actor. He gets paid to do what he is told. Those who remember the movie will give it credit for its fighting choreography at least, no? Bare in mind if there was a flaw in Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy it was the awful fighting choreography. Batman moved like a stiff gargoyle. Hardly a movie comparison but it wasn't all strawberries and cream when it came down to analysing Nolan's take and the Dark Knight Rises also has enough "croaks" to fill a nerd's blog.

Going back to Daredevil, where Ben Affleck played a kick ass blind super hero with a demented past. And while it may not have been the movie fans wanted, Ben Affleck was the best thing about it. Looking at movies such as Changing Lanes (2002), The Town (2010)  and Argo (2012), can he act? Come on, of course he can. Didn't he strike "fear into the hearts of men" in The Town? He delivered two great performances in Changing Lanes and Argo also. If fans are shedding any doubt over his acting credentials, watch the above films.

Adapting to the "dark knight" if you like, may prove challenging, but he isn't inheriting Christian Bale's Gothic voice (thank god). As we know, he will play an older Batman in order to reference the apparent "epic" collision between himself and Superman. However that vision could change.

Would he have been my first choice? No. But even now I can't tell you who would have been. But what I can say is it would not have been Christian Bale. Talks of Bale being offered 50 Million to return appeared extremely false over time. Christian Bale is a man who knows what's right for this franchise and by him not returning is a great stance from the Welshman. Warner Bros. are clearly aiming for something a bit more "light" but with a touch of grit also. If fans of Nolan's trilogy really think Warner Bros are out to destroy the pattern left by Bale they would be extremely gullible. You would like to think that Nolan and co have had a strong input in granting Affleck the opportunity. That is what I believe, and that is what will keep my mind at rest.

Ben Affleck has the build and the inter changeable personality to pull off both Bruce Wayne and Batman. Forget Jersey Girl (2004), the man starred in Hollywoodland (2006), State of Play (2009), both serious enough and quite believable roles that have gone on to place him as the next Batman. It's a new era for both Superman and Batman movies and one might have to get used to the possibility of Ben Affleck playing Batman beyond the Man of Steel sequel. Out with the old and in with the new. As a huge Batman fan (I even like Batman Forever), it would only slightly damage my love for the character if Affleck was to have a "stinker", but then again, I just have to remind myself that it could have been George Clooney...oh wait!

Only God Forgives

It is almost impossible to start off this review without mentioning two things; Nicholas Winding Refn’s cinematic impact, captivating audience global with “Drive” (2009), and of course the continuity of Ryan Gosling’s on-screen success. So of course fans were looking forward to what the two can come up with next in Only God Forgives; a game of who blinks first, who can create the most tension using strictly facial expressions, in fact Refn’s latest vision is so overly pretentious, you just wonder if his ambition to match that of Drive led to sleepless nights, resulting in a very average movie.

Based in the slums of Bangkok, prostitutes and drugs are extremely rife and Julian’s Thai boxing club is at the centre of it all. The club is a smokescreen to hide a family run drug operation in which Julian (Ryan Gosling) runs alongside his brother Billy (Tom Burke). We are not forced to indulge in Billy’s psychotic persona for too long as he is hacked to pieces in a brothel. The savage murder sees the involvement of Julian’s mother Crystal (Kristin Scott Thomas) whose deranged character has clearly rubbed off Julian, resulting in a Norman Bates style relationship

The Bangkok area is patrolled, tortured and extremely feared by the corrupt Chan (Vithaya Pansringarm); a sergeant of the police who murders his victims in a ferocious way.

On one hand we have Crystal who seeks revenge for her son’s death, and then we have Julian who continues to mourn in the creepiest ways possible as he slowly patrols the darkly red corridors of a brothel, aimlessly looking at the walls. Julian spends his nights fantasising about sexual affection, and drifting in and out of the possibility of a showdown with the murderous Chang.

As expected, Refn hits us with a retro themed sound bite that was so significant in Drive. However, while the stage is set in the gritty visuals of Bangkok, Only God forgives fails to provide an efficient story to back up the design. While the plot is supposed to focus on vengeance, the lack of dialogue from the apparent protagonist (Gosling) is surprising as the director goes on to exaggerate his “knack” of creating tension with facial expressions in every scene. And while Julian and Chang do this very well when they match up, the Dracula style piano tune and the consistent thump of a loud drum really creates the atmospheric tempo as its consistent noise becomes a substitute for any potential dialogue.

The movie survives on small talk, strange looks, slow-motion and unnecessary violence. While Refn expressed his grotesque side in Drive previously, he also had characters to back it up. Sure, we can look at Gosling’s on-screen presence all day but the man lacked any soul this time around. Same goes for the small cast involved who spent most of the time advertising stand-stills. 

The Concept of the movie is recognisable coming from Refn's point of view. It is visually satisfying with the sound similar to that of Drive. The "artsy fartsy" clan may claim to acknowledge a sense of enjoyment from Refn's latest but what seemed obvious to me was that Only God Forgives sounds great, it looks pretty slick and while some sequences may be entertainingly weird, it is very far from wonderful.

5/10

Only God Forgives - Trailer 

The Wolverine

Genre: Action/Adventure
Director: James Mangold
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Tao Okamoto, Rila Fukushima, 
Running: 129 Mins

If there is one thing we can all agree on in terms of X Men's prolific Wolverine character, is that Hugh Jackman enjoys the hell out playing him. And while X Men: The last stand (2006), along with Wolverine (2009) have been pretty much steam rolled and crapped on by not only comic book fans but movie buffs as a whole. Hugh is undoubtedly adamant in providing cinema-goers with a longer lasting taste in their mouth this time around, and that taste doesn't necessarily have to be a bitter one.

The Wolverine is a more in depth focus on Logan's struggle to overcome the fact that he has and will more than likely continue to struggle with his mutant ability. Following the events of The last stand, Logan is located out in the cold (literally) as his wolverine skills are put to good use as his choice of a nomadic lifestyle results in a homeless rugged wolverine. His dark days are spent suffering with regrettable nightmares relating to Jean Grey (Famke Janssen). Logan is hunted down as the great "Wolverine" by Yukio (Rila Fukushima) and invited to Japan where he will be tested of his true desire with Yashida (Hal Yamanouchi) offering him the chance of immortality. It is the event of that meeting that leads Wolverine into a physical battle of emotion and choices as Logan is caught up in an internal war, as Yashida's niece (Tao Okamoto) is targeted by the sleazy Viper (Svetlana Khodchenkova) and her cohorts. 

Logan is attacked from all angles as he begins to realise that the Viper is after much more than Yashida's niece,  leading him into the fight of his life even if it means losing a lot of blood. Wolverine embarks on an exciting warpath, one that involves less exaggeration (Helicopter battles free) and some straight up gut wrenching!

Directed by James Mangold (Walk the Line), The Wolverine is an explosive adventure when it needs to be, adding a touch of drama when it mattered. Hugh Jackman's Wolverine is far more engaging this time around, as you follow him from the events in Japan, to the cold woods right through to his battle with immortality, you pity the Wolverine at times, particularly in his struggle to let go of his true love that was Jean Grey (X.Men).

The staging premise in Japan is a wonderful set, giving off quite a comic book feel with a dark twist. While the overall cast is not much to brag about, the chemistry between Jackman and Rila Fukushima is very surprising as you will find yourself rooting for Rila's kick ass character just as much as Wolverine.

The Wolverine stages some satisfying action scenes such as the scrap on the bullet train, and while it is probably the most far-fetched scene in the entire movie, you understand the concept and quickly adapt to the vision of Mangold which ultimately leads to a showdown of many battles. Numerous villains such as The Viper, Shingen, Noburo (excluding the abundance of cohorts) is one flaw of the movie as it appears messy at times and quite direction-less as there is no official focus on a particular villain which can lead to you completely forgetting who you should fear until they get screen time. The Viper is probably the worst villain played in any Marvel movie so far. Maybe it was the actor or the writer's job, but she was plain and simply crap, dull, characterless and just down right careless. She reminded me of Uma Thurman's poison Ivy performance; poor and downright irrelevant. The Viper is noticeably filled in to add a touch of dangerous femininity which turns out to be boring!

We could talk of the bullshit romance that unexpectedly develops for Logan, but let's not be too harsh; with great cinema comes great stupidity, and the wolverine, make no mistake, throws in some stupidity but nowhere near the car crash that was X.Men Origins.

The Wolverine is really enjoyable, with Hugh Jackman's admiration for the character shining brighter than ever. Whether this will lead to another X.Men flick time will tell, but if it was a choice between another "tired" Patrick Stewart X.Men, or an official Wolverine sequel, a Wolverine sequel would probably come off better.

Overall: A great action flick under a well designed premise, and while the villains could have had more character, it is still highly entertaining.

7/10



....

This is the End

Genre: Comedy
Director: Evan Goldberg & Seth Rogen 
Starring: James Franco, Seth Rogan, Craig Robinson, Jay Baruchel & Jonah Hill
Running: 107 Mins

A gathering of "stoners" and every Seth Rogen cohort you can think of, turn up for James Franco's house warming. Sounds like a lot of fun, especially if you are actually friends with these guys. But unfortunately, a seat in a dark room with a big ass screen is as close as we are going to get to witnessing the adventure of six of the funniest guys in Hollywood (at the moment); Jonah Hill, Seth Rogen, James Franco, Craig Robinson, Danny McBride and Jay Baruchel. 

Seth Rogen plans a weekend of consistent weed smoking and 3D television with Jay Baruchel. Much to Jay's disappointment, a the change of plan results in the attendance of James Franco's house warming party featuring a bunch of Hollywood comedic personalities; an atmosphere that Jay would have liked to avoid. However Jay isn't forced to endure the vanity of Jonah Hill for too long as an apparent Earth Quake ruptures the centre of Hollywood, opening up the ground and swallowing many victims (most of the party actually). A group of six are barricaded in Franco's house with very little food and not much patience, resulting in the hilarious circumstance that showcases the witty humour and the chemistry involved with each actor. This is the end depends on the bond that each personality share with each other in the real world, carrying that over, resulting in an effortless movie that comes across extremely well rounded, even if it does become stupidly far-fetched toward the end.

If you enjoyed "Superbad" (2008) and "Knocked up" (2007), you will love this. If you don't enjoy crude humour and you are not one for recognising a bunch of movie references when you hear them, well then you will struggle to engage and I for one, pity you. This is the end survives on crude dialogue and a lot of references relating to the career of each actor and movies in general. As seen in Superbad and Knocked up, the cast are serious movie fans, with a premise that sets out to both mock and praise Hollywood movies. This is the end is very similar; but original due to the casts official identity, slagging their own personal experiences in Hollywood, regretting some of their own flicks which makes for great comedy.

If you include cameo's such as Michael Cera, Emma Watson and many more, the overall cast is huge and gives you so much more than the trailer shows us (which is rare might I add). However, the star of the show is James Franco who, following on from his role in Pineapple Express continues to show his comedic side. James Franco is simply hilarious, and partly out shines the "true" comedians if you like.

This is the end is by no means consistently funny, with the last 20 minutes appearing extremely nuts and a bit silly. But we forget these guys are constantly "high", once again going with a "dizzy stoner" premise that worked so well in Pineapple Express and Knocked Up. You will find scenes being noticeably set up for the next. And while Jay Baruchul and Craig Robinson get themselves into some funny situations, it is the back to back bickering from each individual that really makes this movie memorable.

This is the end is no "Superbad" which is not too unfortunate as it succeeds in trying so desperately to move on, however fans of Seth Rogen and co will have such a good time with this one.

Overall: Great cast  - Far-fetched - Not consistently funny - but, when it's funny...it's hilarious

7.5/10

See it if you liked: Superbad, Knocked up and Pineapple Express.

Fast and Furious 6

Genre: Action/Thriller/Comedy
Director: Justin Lin
Starring: Dwayne Johnson, Vin Diesel & Paul Walker
Running: 130 Mins

So the fast and furious saga continues. Saga is correct? Well in Rocky Balboa terms it is so who is to say we can't use it here? Dom and sidekick Brian return to race and blow stuff up, however this time around their wicked maneuvers is appreciated due to the fact that "The Rock" is no longer their nemesis!

Living it up in European islands the gang is scattered far from home as they spend their hard earned cash from the heist in Rio (Fast Five). However all holidays must end soon, even for rookie criminals as Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) finds the whereabouts of Dom (Vin Diesel), offering him an ultimatum which relates to former lover Letty (Michelle Rodriguez) who is potentially well and truly living. Hanging out with a gang of road mercenaries, Letty is involved with Shaw (Luke Evans) - the kingpin Hobbs is so adamant to get hold of. It is through that exposure that convinces Dom to reassemble the crew in order to trace the gang and find some truth behind Letty's fictional death.

The masculine presence of Dom is completely overshadowed by Hobbs with the performance and overall showmanship of Dwayne Johnson stealing the role of the protagonist. It is fair to say we have come to the point of no return for both Dom and Brian (Paul Walker) as the once clever companionship is most times irrelevant and over seen as the creators of Fast and Furious are clearly paving way for the actions of Dwayne Johnson - and could we blame them? Dwayne Johnson owns Fast and furious 6, just as he did with Fast Five. And while there is some entertaining fist fights featuring the team work of himself and Diesel, we all know that Johnson could have done without him.

Struggling to forget the eh, forgetful 2 Fast 2 Furious, characters such as Roman (Tyrese Gibson), Tej (Ludacris) and Han (Sung Kang) are still scripted to do something funny or insanely stupid. Their presence is practically nonexistent, with "jive" comedy supplied by Roman falling on its knees every time.

The latest adventure is just as explosive and extremely funny when it's not supposed to be; with Dom and the gang always finding a reason to race leading to some entertaining scenes as they dodge tanks, take down airplanes while Vin Diesel showcases his best Superman impression - fans will be impressed by both the explosive action and the overall look of the movie, even if it is hilariously far-fetched!

Resembling the fast paced, at times dramatic story of Fast Five, the writers are clearly ambitious and some what reluctant to slow down anytime soon, offering a concept similar to Sly's Expendable's, meaning you just never know who you might see in the next drag race. And while "The Fast and the Furious" (2001) focused solely on car racing and the obsession and corruption behind it, the once dramatic tale has given birth to five new chapters that have slowly gone off the original concept. That is not to say it is a bad thing, in fact some might disagree when I say the first movie is the best. Why? Because we have adapted to what has become a franchise of utter silliness, yet they signify Hollywood's determination for blockbusters; known as movies that offer nothing other than a mindless euphoric cinema trip - and frankly, we don't mind.

Overall: Explosively Entertaining = 7.8/10

The Hangover Part III

Genre: Comedy
Director: Todd Phillips
Starring: Bradley Cooper, Zack Galifianakis, Ed Helms, Ken Jeong. 
Running: 100 Mins

While The Hangover was pretty original, Todd Philips shows for the third time around that his visionary comedies are pretty funny but at times, one dimensional.  The Hangover part III looks to take a new direction (hangover free). So how did Todd and the guys get on this time around?

The guys are worried for the mental health of Alan (Zack Galifianakis) following the sudden death of his father. While Alan is hilariously obnoxious in refusing to cooperate, it is the presence of Phil (Bradly Cooper) and Stu (Ed Helms) that helps reel Alan into what he believes to be the return of the wolf pack. However things take an expected turn for the worst as the gang are ambushed on route to Alan's destination. Doug (Justin Bartha) is kidnapped. Phil and Stu can't help but ignore the name of Chow who has a big part to play in the mess they will inevitably become part of.

On the orders of Marshall (John Goodman) the guys must find and return Chow - or Doug is a dead man.

And so begins a wild goose chase that is sometimes funny, yet most times boring and child like with the concept slowly but surely loosing the clever, witty comedic effort it supplied in the first movie. The onscreen companionship of both Chow and Alan is what saves this comedic effort from completely sinking. The character of Chow is in your face the whole time with sequences of loud, over the top camp-ness, revealing a movie that could have been called "Hangover: The origin of Chow".

Zack Galifianakis continues to advertise the same character he plays in everything. Of course we expect nothing less than humorous dialog from this guy and that is just what we get - with a more twisted mind-set from the once touched-friendly Alan who is now on the verge of straight up murdering someone. Not everyone will appreciate the sudden change of character or maybe you won't even notice.

The apparent importance of Alan is so drawn out at this stage that he completely shuts out the presence of both Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms. The Hangover III reveals that while Chow becomes annoying, along with the peculiar change of Zack's character, we will still munch on our popcorn and laugh on occasions with or without Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms - Hangover III so desperately wanted to take a new direction that they forgot about Cooper and Helms. It is a bit of a shame, but yet this is what happens when one man steals the show from the very beginning.

We did not need the Hangover III, let alone a sequel. Yet this is modern day Hollywood and while it is funny on occasions, one can not help but notice a desperate attempt for new material has resulted in a two man show - Chow and Alan. The Hangover part III is funnier than the sequel (in small sequences), but just as forgetful. The wolf pack may live on, but not to fill the pockets of the Hollywood hierarchy.

Overall: Partly Funny - unoriginal - over the top - beats the sequel - highly forgetful 

5.5/10

Star Trek Into Darkness

When J.J. Abrams reinvented Star Trek back in 2009 his intention was to appeal to fans of the franchise and the not so, taking the ever so popular modern element of things and running with it. Doing so has reeled in a huge demographic; if not for the plot, then for the fantastic sequences of action. Those who thoroughly enjoyed Star Trek's Hollywood return were left to anticipate an exciting sequel in what was surely on my list of the summers most exciting movies. Star Trek into Darkness has not only satisfied my thirst for action, but its simple plot of revenge along with the return of Kirk and Spock that has paved way for a J.J. Abrams inter galactic trilogy. 

Beginning at a fast pace, we are immediately reminded of Kirk's (Chris Pine) leadership upon the Enterprise as he puts the crew in jeopardy following his decision to save Spock (Zachary Quinto) from an erupting volcano. Thinking about friendship rather than the reputation of the federation, Kirk is demoted and the Enterprise removed from his control. Meanwhile John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) is about to destroy the federation from the inside out, reinstating his own history with the federation by blowing up one of its organisations in London. His catastrophic mark is the first of many as he sets on destroying everything in his path using personal revenge as a valuable motive.

Kirk convinces Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller aka Robocop) to let him go after John who is holding ground in Klingon territory.

So begins a cat and mouse plot, as Kirk along with Spock regather the team of explorers in a bid to capture the one man army that is John. Desperate to bring John to justice, Kirk and the Enterprise fight through the powerful force of John, only to unravel a historic tale of love and revenge, leading to consequential decisions from everyone on board the ship.

The star of the show here is Spock, as he continuously plays the conscience of Kirk to a wonderful extent. Spock is involved in a tremendous introduction and a frenetic showdown.  His onscreen friendship with Kirk is both comedic and dramatically heartfelt through out the events of the Enterprise's ambitious man hunt. Chris Pine is brilliant as he masters the heroic persona of Kirk once again - showing off his dramatic skills also, in scenes of quality acting.

This is not a "leave your brain at the door" type of flick, so it is open to people who choose to nit-pick at potential flaws of the movie. In terms of Star Trek history, I am not the guy, however Star Trek into Darkness does offer scenes of endless solutions, even at the worst of times. While Kirk's vigilante style heroics are played to the fullest, the movie's disastrous scenes are always met with simple, yet predictable solutions in almost impossible circumstances. I found that quite annoying through-out, and you will find these decisions being carried out right up to the climatic ending. I would not have been surprised to see Spock or Kirk whip out shark spray from a bat belt!

But ignoring their desperate attempt at survival, the villainous presence of John Harrison is spine tingling  This guy does not hold back. The heartless thrive of John reminds you that of agent Smith in the Matrix. Comparing powers would be fun actually!

Into Darkness offers a more dramatic element than the first movie, revealing a selfishness within certain characters of the movie, which blends nicely with the darker, more in-dept elements of the sequel. 

Star Trek into Darkness is a good time, as J.J. Abrams shows off his brilliant imagination and his motivation behind transferring a simple plot of revenge using quality cinematic visuals for you to explore. Just like the first movie, the dialog involved with characters such as Kirk and Spock, not forgetting Scotty (Simon Pegg) and Bones (Karl Urban) who are all a joy to engage with.

8.5/10

Star Trek 3 has been announced for 2016, while fans can look forward to J.J. Abrams and his take on Star Wars in  Star Wars: Episode VII.

Evil Dead

Let's start by admitting something that I am quite ashamed to admit; I have never seen the original that was "The Evil Dead" (1981). While this can be viewed as quite an appalling statement, it serves me a slight benefit. Why? well, while I plan on watching the original sometime in life, I was happy to have the courtesy of going to see Evil Dead without being too fussy. While I am normally the "oh, how it's just not as good, or even near enough the same as the original" type of guy, it was nice to change the scenery a bit, leaving me with no knowledge of the franchise and lots of curiosity (you have come to the right place). I was optimistic in every way. So all I can say is this; Evil Dead 2013 is quite possibly the finest, most astonishing horror movie since The Exorcist. Below is an anti pedantic review on a movie being hailed as one of few horror remakes worth remembering.

Brief: A group of friends head to an isolated cabin in the woods, where a book of the dead will decide their inevitable death.

Mia (Jane Levy) is determined to quash her drug habit. She agrees to go cold turkey in the company of her trusty friends. Considered an ideal spot for Mia to rehabilitate, Mia's brother David (Shiloh Fernandez) and co are weary of her consistency. Just as Mia gets cold turkey, so do the surrounding woods, as dim-wit companion Eric (Lou Taylor Pucci) discovers a book of the dead, unleashing a demonic force beneath the cabin as a frightening history returns to strike its victim; that victim is Mia. Mia is possessed by a girl of the past, but the illogical the crew put her possessive behaviour down to "cold turkey" - their lack of logic (taking into account the cabin has been isolated for years) results in a game of death worth witnessing.

Evil Dead is a fine throwback to 80s horror - with an element that relies on frightening you through the use of graphical images, rather than jump scares. While there are many attempts at surprising the viewer with a screech or two, Evil Dead survives on disturbing the mind rather the art of suspense.

The movie's introduction is excellent, giving you a taste of what your in for; chopped limbs, blood is vomited and nails pierce every part of the human body - all extreme fun and a great reference to the meaning of true horror.

While Evil Dead depends on its grotesque element, it should by no means be attached to the brain-farts that were Hostel and Saw 3, 4 and the rest.  It differs from "torture-porn", adding a touch of dark humour and scenes of over top sprees of violence.

One or two cast members are beyond irritating; David and his "Everything is fine" attitude becomes annoying and quite illogical considering the circumstances. Jane Levy, who plays protagonist Mia, shows great onscreen potential, specifically in scenes that show evidence of her being realistically frightened.

A modern horror remake can hardly show one trailer without critics of old an new slating it, asking the question - why? I am one of them, and pessimism can be a second language of mine. And while I have not seen Sam Rami's (complete control) 1981 creation, I can't honestly ask the question as I and many have, and will continue to ask - why?

Never the less, Evil Dead convinced me, showing no sign of laziness, while the  production did a great job re-kindling some creativity in terms of crafting the props we see through-out. The involvement of CGI here is minimum, which in my mind shows proof of the productions desire to show, that at some stage, we can't keep living in the past. While the 80s will never be forgotten, Hollywood can be forgiven at some stage - and while we are quick to set a light to The Thing, A Nightmare on Elm st and Halloween (dam you Rob Zombie), I am confident that Evil Dead will get the respect it deserves - at least from a large minority of horror movie buffs. Why shouldn't it? It's the type of horror we have been asking for. And if you think that the minor change in plot was unnecessary, think again. It is vital that remakes of good and bad switch it up slightly in order to show its creativity, and some what "balls" by expanding on what we already know and hope to enjoy.

Overall: There is a plot here, but it tends to go missing on occasions, but horror fans will adore this movie, as the grotesque element is both hilarious and exceptionally disturbing.

Movie Quote: "Why don't you come down here and let me suck your cock, pretty boy?" - A possessed and horny Mia

7/10

The Place Beyond the Pines

As far as Ryan Gosling movies go, Blue Valentine (2010) is by far my favourite. Heck I would even throw it onto my invisible list of all time favourites. Those who have seen Blue Valentine will know that director Derek Cianfrance created an absolute gem of a movie, bringing out a riveting performance from Gosling. Derek returns with Gosling once again, showboating a frenetic drama consisting of three chapters that are pieced together over a total of 15 years.

Luke is a motorbike performer, entertaining tourists in the local circus. Walking out to an eagerly awaited crowd, Luke is clearly adored for his skills on a dirt-bike rather than his personality. Luring in the background is the beautiful Romina (Eva Mendes). Immediately we witness an evolved chemistry that spells history. While Luke is clearly fond of his own company, he can't ignore his love for Romina, considering the kid she shares with her boyfriend is indeed Luke's. Adamant to win Romina back, Luke hooks up Robin, played by the ever so brilliant Ben Mendelsohn.

Aside from Robin's generosity in offering Luke a place to stay, Robin gives Luke the chance to put his motorbike skills to good use. With the prospect of having enough money to provide for Romina and his boy, Luke agrees to rob a bank, with the assistance of Robin.

Luke's personality is bleak, with a troubled past hanging over him. This shows evidence when his hunger for more money becomes his weakness. Luke collides with Avery (Bradley Cooper); a dedicated force of the law who is struggling to cope with a level of corruptness in his department. Avery comes face to face with his morals as he is up against Ray Liotta and co, who are out to test Avery's loyalty in more ways than others. 

This is a brilliantly shot movie with dumbed down dialogue that just reels you in with every character. Watching Gosling on the bike is mesmerising, while the enormous sounds of the bike makes you feel like your sitting on the back of it!

The Place beyond the Pines is a dark focus on the choices in life and the morals you choose to take with you. While it is told over three  magnificent chapters, the final chapter is quite ordinary and strangely different. Although it is still relevant, I had to keep reminding myself that I am watching the same film.

Gosling is wonderful to watch, re-kindling an inspirational presence that will remind you of the character we adored in Drive. Bradley Cooper generates quite a serious performance this time around, in which I must admit was hard to engage in at first, but his tied circumstances helps his character to grow as you begin to love, pity and despise his presence.

While we expected nothing other than a memorable performance from Ryan Gosling, even he couldn't save the third half of a movie that was so far from what was, it became such a pain in the ass to watch.

 Its only downfall is the coincidental finale. It appeared too desperate, attempting to connect the dots over a 15 year period. Avery's jive talking son is so irritating you just wonder what on earth the writer was thinking! The extended story was still intriguing (at times), with a modern high-school step up, but was it necessary? No.  However it did stick to the generational concept of "crossing paths". The unpredictable writers of this movie continue to brag about how this "place beyond the pines" is so far from a one man show, it is willing to throw anything at you - the Eminem impersonator is proof of that, while the cheesy ending doesn't help either.

Still, the final chapter is just as watchable, and that is down to the inclusion of prospect actor Dane DeHaan,who is quite possibly the savour to what would have been a disastrous third chapter that followed an engaging first.

8/10

Look out for: Only God Forgives - May/June 2013. You can watch the trailer below

Dark Skies

Aliens have chosen your home. So what would you do about it? Although Dark Skies does not teach us anything new in terms of the potential existence of an Alien race, it does show you that boarding up your house to prevent abduction is a waste of time...they are aliens for Christ sake! RUN!

With a neat quote on how we are not alone to begin with, Dark Skies is the story of the Barretts; a family struggling to cope with financial issues. Just as things begin to go their way, a majority of supernatural mishaps is forced upon their suburban house; while sequences of moving objects, ringing noises and an empty fridge might be something to deal with, a flock of birds from three different directions is not, leaving the family to question what is turning into a series of unexplainable events.

As we know, there is always a peculiar member of the family. In this case Sam (Kadan Rockett); their youngest and certainly the cutest. Sam spends his days talking to the sandman, who as we see time and time again in these suspenseful stories, the chances of the so-called sandman existing are very high. While the mother Lacy (Keri Russell) is passing it up as childlike immaturity, Lacy begins to realise that the events in the house could be related to Sam.

Struggling to convince her husband Daniel (Josh Hamilton) of the potential danger the family is involved in, Daniel typically shrugs it off as a dose of paranoia (the man never believes the wife, why?)

It is following the visit it to an Alien connoisseur (J.K. Simmons) that all is revealed; the house has been targeted by aliens. And as blunt as it may sound, there is no apparent solution to this, however Daniel is adamant to protect his family.

There is a majority of boring sequences involving nothing, with the second half of the movie trying to justify an alien invasion under bizarre circumstances, with the typical involvement of someone who has spent their entire life searching for answers.

I was really looking forward to this, knowing that the producer of both Sinister  and Insidious are involved, I was hoping to be satisfied in terms of a good story and a good scare. The story had potential, with an introduction that gets you quickly involved but the second half of the movie just lost its way. I was willing to ignore the majority of boring sequences of unrelated dialogue and drug using teenagers (although Jesse, played by Dakota Goyo, is quite a rebel) in order to be really frightened because let's face it, I don't remember seeing modern day Alien style horror like this? They don't come around very frequent so I wanted this to work.

Sure, some scenes were cool, the birds, the hungry Aliens etc, but there was too much stupidity brought on by Daniel that I failed to get involved with any of the leading characters. They are caught up in unfortunate circumstances, but you fail to lend them any pity. You root for the Aliens (when they appear).

With one or two scares involving the appearance of Aliens, I wanted more. Dark Skies failed to stay consistent.

Although the trailer survives on promoting Sinister and Insidious, it his for that reason Dark Skies falls flat, using a similar concept of horror through-out (or script if you like); the drawings, the strange kid, abduction, if you have seen Sinister or Insidious you will know what I mean when I say it is all way too similar.

Overall: It is no Fire in the Sky, Signs and certainly no Close Encounters. However the uncontainable use of drama could be ignored to understand a mundane story. I give it credit for its screeching scares every now in again, but the characters and the plot are way too similar with a second half that looses its touch.

5/10

Look out for: The potentially worthy remake of Evil Dead & The Conjuring - July (Trailer below)

Trance

 

Let's not kid ourselves here, British director Daniel Boyle has a knack for crafting such wonderful movies; with Trainspotting and 127 hours to say the least. In fact, passing up the opportunity to direct Alien Resurrection back in the day was the result of quite a prolific career, saving him a destruction from followers of the Alien franchise.

This hypnotic mind bender tells the story of Simon (James McAvoy); an auctioneer who finds himself at the centre of a tug of war regarding a painting worth millions. Although Simon is involved in stealing the painting to clear a gambling depth, a sudden turn of events leaves Simon with a loss of memory, oblivious to where he left the painting - leaving criminal kingpin Frank, unimpressed.

Frank (Vincent Cassel) and his thugs are left sweating and rampaged following the robbery, questioning Simon's mischievous actions. While Frank is convinced of Simon's sudden memory loss, he is Adamant on recovering the million dollar painting, setting Simon up with Elisabeth (Rosario Dawson ); a local hypnotherapist who joins forces with Frank in order to help retrace the steps of Simon, in which they both hope will help recover the painting - leaving everyone except Simon extremely rich.

As Simon vividly explores his memory with Elisabeth, it seems that she and everyone else have a bigger part to play in this puzzle, revealing a dramatic tale of desire, obsession and greed.

James McAvoy is a joy to watch once again. Offering a low key performance originally, the character of Simon is forced to up the antics in a bid to discover the truth. On the other end of the stick is Vincent Cassel, who some might recognise from french movie La Haine. Although the screen presence of Vincent was far from convincing at first, you slowly grow to enjoy his on screen his presence (I did anyway).

Danny Boyle's latest is different in terms of its lack of comedic effort; an aspect we know all too well from his previous work. The inclusion of Rosario Dawson creates an aspect of extreme sexiness to the plot, while a showboating chemistry between herself and Cassel adds to the erotic element. Trance is far from flawless. Although Boyle knows how to construct a good movie visually, using angles of realism on the topic of hypnosis, it supplies unlimited endings, with a climax failing to break free at times, adding sequences of sheer confusion -  (Hypnosis anyone?) While the movie is of average length, I felt the anticipated twist could have been wrapped up at an earlier stage. As the flashy images of past and present corrode the screen, you will find yourself piecing the dialogue together after the movie in order to realise what is actually a clever twist.

Trance is an intriguing psychological thriller with originality that will sit among Hollywood's directorial competition. Smartly shot with a topic of realism and a plot that consistently calls for your attention. Trance offers a frightening perspective on the power of hypnosis.

Overall: An Ending that failed to, well, end on occasions, the overall twist is satisfying once you get your head around it. The performance from both McAvoy and Cassel make Trance as memorable as it has been perceived thus far.

7.6/10

Maniac

Elijah Wood has been off the grid lately. Sure he appeared in the Hobbit (obviously), but he hasn't
pitched a starring role in quite a while. So when a small time trailer connecting Elijah and serial killer, I was surprised; not of his return, but his role choice.

Maniac - have you heard of this movie? you are about to, not only through my opinion, but many others. Directed by Franck Khalfoun, Maniac is best described as outlandish, introducing a dark and gritty concept that takes grotesque to a new level.

An introduction of retro style music and dark scenes of mean streets, Maniac delivers a sequence of pure class upon the introduction of Frank (Elijah Wood); a deranged stalker of the streets. From the off we see this kid lacks everything except his skill for murder. Visioned through the eyes of Frank, the grotesque method is forced upon as he stalks, whispers and inevitably chases his first victim through the hallway of a hotel - BOOM - slashed in epic style, the retro music enforces the title of the movie to bolder the screen, Maniac, in thick red old school font. What I was in for? I thought I knew, I was wrong.

Tormented by his nightmarish upbringing, Frank lives in a shop occupied by mannequins; which seem to be his only company. However things change for Frank has his obsession for collecting human scalps is unwillingly put on hold as he meets Anna (Nora Arnezeder); a cute little french girl who takes a liking to the mannequins in his the shop. It is when she requests to rent the mannequins for an exhibition that sees a relationship evolve, but not the way Frank would have wanted it. Struggling to maintain his murderous obsession, Frank continues to slay the women of the streets, while trying to be a friend to Anna - which Frank knows mentally, can never happen.

Sure, people walked out of this movie and rightly so. But I on the other hand loved it. Maniac is a respected horror movie, shot using first person angles. I though that was bad ass because it provided and maintained a level of realness throughout the entire movie. We only get to see Frank in mirror reflections, which in most cases he is seen puking into the toilet as his horrendous physique gives off a shock-horror premise that pumps up the gore in every scene. Not to give too much away, but there is a scene when Frank is pursuing another female, chasing her through a train station and ending up in a car park. Thinking she got away Scott-free, we are with Frank under a car as he slashes her ankle, revealing the entire bone that just popped out of her skin!

There are moments in the movie that just spell unnecessary and down right haunting. We get a fine insight into what potentially drove this kid to insanity and yes it does include his mother in scenes that I can only describe as shock-horror. You might walk out remembering this movie for the wrong reasons. I had to overcome the fact that the deaths in this movie could of actually been the sacrifice of real humans - It is horrifically realistic.

Maniac arrived under the radar. I like those type of movies. Elijah Wood gives a brutal, yet static performance, even though the majority of sequences provide you with nothing other than his bloody hands. Was the plot logical? sure, in a way. I mean it is based on the mind of a serial killer suffering with problems bigger than female hatred. I have to agree with the poster; "a modern horror classic". We are too used to paying into movies that offer the potential of a good scare, but really, chances are, we have seen it time and time again. Maniac forcefully delivers a blender of ingredients mashed up of Michael Myers and Drive. Yes, if Drive was a horror, it would be this.

Overall: A strange movie, but one that is easy to follow. The stalking premise and grotesque scenes will send shivers down your spine. Forget ghosts and demons, Maniac has provided a window of opportunity for producers to follow a similar path.

It is a joy to watch if your squeamish...

8/10

86YWQR6NC2FU