Excuse the language but holy shit have you seen the latest Spiderman trailer? Following the Electro advertised teaser we all saw a few months back, the official trailer is here and my god it makes me think why I would ever wish Marvel to go on holiday for a while...okay The Avengers was something special); as was The Amazing Spiderman (2012).
I am going to go out on a limb here and say, and while it is still early days, this might be the best Marvel superhero blockbuster since The Avengers (2012).
As far as Ryan Gosling movies go, Blue Valentine (2010)is by far my favourite. Heck I would even throw it onto my invisible list of all time favourites. Those who have seen Blue Valentine will know that director Derek Cianfrancecreated an absolute gem of a movie, bringing out a riveting performance from Gosling. Derek returns with Gosling once again, showboating a frenetic drama consisting of three chapters that are pieced together over a total of 15 years.
Luke is a motorbike performer, entertaining tourists in the local circus. Walking out to an eagerly awaited crowd, Luke is clearly adored for his skills on a dirt-bike rather than his personality. Luring in the background is the beautiful Romina (Eva Mendes). Immediately we witness an evolved chemistry that spells history. While Luke is clearly fond of his own company, he can't ignore his love for Romina, considering the kid she shares with her boyfriend is indeed Luke's. Adamant to win Romina back, Luke hooks up Robin, played by the ever so brilliant Ben Mendelsohn.
Aside from Robin's generosity in offering Luke a place to stay, Robin gives Luke the chance to put his motorbike skills to good use. With the prospect of having enough money to provide for Romina and his boy, Luke agrees to rob a bank, with the assistance of Robin.
Luke's personality is bleak, with a troubled past hanging over him. This shows evidence when his hunger for more money becomes his weakness. Luke collides with Avery (Bradley Cooper); a dedicated force of the law who is struggling to cope with a level of corruptness in his department. Avery comes face to face with his morals as he is up against Ray Liotta and co, who are out to test Avery's loyalty in more ways than others.
This is a brilliantly shot movie with dumbed down dialogue that just reels you in with every character. Watching Gosling on the bike is mesmerising, while the enormous sounds of the bike makes you feel like your sitting on the back of it!
The Place beyond the Pines is a dark focus on the choices in life and the morals you choose to take with you. While it is told over three magnificent chapters, the final chapter is quite ordinary and strangely different. Although it is still relevant, I had to keep reminding myself that I am watching the same film.
Gosling is wonderful to watch, re-kindling an inspirational presence that will remind you of the character we adored in Drive. Bradley Cooper generates quite a serious performance this time around, in which I must admit was hard to engage in at first, but his tied circumstances helps his character to grow as you begin to love, pity and despise his presence.
While we expected nothing other than a memorable performance from Ryan Gosling, even he couldn't save the third half of a movie that was so far from what was, it became such a pain in the ass to watch.
Its only downfall is the coincidental finale. It appeared too desperate, attempting to connect the dots over a 15 year period. Avery's jive talking son is so irritating you just wonder what on earth the writer was thinking! The extended story was still intriguing (at times), with a modern high-school step up, but was it necessary? No. However it did stick to the generational concept of "crossing paths". The unpredictable writers of this movie continue to brag about how this "place beyond the pines" is so far from a one man show, it is willing to throw anything at you - the Eminem impersonator is proof of that, while the cheesy ending doesn't help either.
Still, the final chapter is just as watchable, and that is down to the inclusion of prospect actor Dane DeHaan,who is quite possibly the savour to what would have been a disastrous third chapter that followed an engaging first.
8/10
Look out for: Only God Forgives - May/June 2013. You can watch the trailer below
A flashback to a fantasy premise we know all to well, but missed the most!
I would like to start off by wishing you all a HAPPY NEW YEAR and may 2013 bring the best, and possibly the worst of movies! :)
Following and yet trailing behind a trilogy that many claim to be the best movies ever made, Peter Jackson returns with much hesitation. Eagerly anticipated is an understatement, fans global shared mixed reactions before the release following the destiny of the Hobbit; a trilogy. What some might have expected, others were in a state of limbo as the "bookish" clan were quick to judge. It is fair to say the "not as good as the book clan" might have been disgusted with Jackson's desire to extend what is quite a short novel, the movie industry, like many is a business, were very few movies will fail to go-ahead unless a profit is foreseen. In this case, a profit will be seen as well as a beautifully constructed dream-like flashback to an origin that would create Frodo's quest.
The protagonist in this story is Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman). Bilbo is some what a reclusive resident of the Shire who spends his days cooking, cleaning and admiring the green hilltops that surround the land. However the reluctant persona in Bilbo is recognised when the intrusion of Gandalf (Ian McKellen) is upon him. Gandalf is a mythical wizard, a character in who Bilbo can only believe as false as there are very few people that have crossed the path of Bilbo Baggins.
Gandalf recognises the distressed character within Bilbo. Much to the annoyance of Bilbo, it is when a gathering of Dwarfs disturb him later that night. The course of that unwelcoming meal goes on to change Bilbo's direction in life.
Bewildered to the reasons behind his unwelcoming guests, Bilbo soon learns that he is chosen by Gandalf to accompany the dwarfs on a quest to the east of the land...far from the Shire. Leading the dwarfs is Thorin (Richard Armitage), an ignorant dwarf with a past he seeks to avenge by claiming back the dwarfs habitat. However the task is easier said than done as it is a journey that is set to test the nerves of the dwarfs and more importantly, the courage of the Hobbit, Bilbo Baggins.
The hobbit begins at slow pace but not as bad as I was originally told. Yes, it moves slow but the dialogue seeks to pave the way for the journey to follow. The meal between the dwarfs, Bilbo and Gandalf will be recognised as quite an iconic scene in what is resembled as a series of characters supporting superb chemistry. From the unknown Dwarfs to the popular, each improvisation doesn't go a miss. I found the overall humour to be more childish than LOTR, however it suits the concept and not forgetting the book is a children's fantasy novel. Peter Jackson pays a fine tribute in that case.
Martin Freeman is no doubt the stand out performance. He gives a presence of character that tricks you into believing he has always been around, but yet we know he hasn't. His acting credentials are represented greatly for the two and a half hours. In typical Lord of the Rings fashion, the movies concept and overall time line thrives on the events surrounding the journey from A to B. Each scene is met with a flash forward of what we know to have seen, and a flashback of the history of the Dwarf. The humorous rivalry is once again shown between the elf's and Dwarfs, and like I said, there is a dark history that reveals the aged rivalry between the pair.
All I heard was the fact Peter Jackson shot this movie at 48fps (frames per second). I was weary going into this because I was warned about adjusting my eyes to it. All I can say to you is ignore that and just enjoy it for what you see. I saw no big deal an I believe no matter what frame was used the overall result is just as fantastic. If anything though, the 48fps (which is normally 24fps) make the action sequences look and feel superb. There are scenes of interventions from trolls and orcs that stand in the way of the clans destination. The final hour and a half sums up the routine climax that Peter Jackson has consistently greeted us with; not to mention the best scene in the entire film, Gollum's introduction, once again played by Andy Serkis.
Harrelson, Rockwell and Walken all good....Farrell, not so much!
From Martin McDonagh comes another brilliantly developed movie with the characteristics similar to that of In Bruges (2008).
Let's start by saying upon the release of the trailer, there wasn't a movie that looked as unattractive as this one. I mean I did not want to see this movie, in fact I passed this one up to see Rise Of The Guardians at one stage. Why? well an apparent dark and twisted comedy just didn't look that funny. I have been wrong before, and I am yet again.
Seven psychopaths tells the story of a struggling screen writer who through-out the mundane events in life has lacked the activity of the pen. Based in Los Angeles, Marty (Colin Farrell) is mind-set on creating a love story, with a touch of violence. The movie? seven psychopaths. Although a writers block refrains him from lifting off, it seems a designated plot comes round when friends Billy (Sam Rockwell) and Hans (Christopher Walken) steal a Shih-Tzu from the wrong guy.
Running a corruption business that involves a rob and return routine, the guys are unaware of the gangster reputation behind Charlie (Woody Harrelson). Marty gets caught up inadvertently, leaving a mess that he Billy and Hans must clean up (to stay alive).
The introduction to McDonagh's four year return immediately describes the sheer madness to come. Seven psychopaths is hilariously gory and extremely unpredictable. Marty is an alcoholic character who is centred as the main character and carries a storyline that could have done without his presence; maybe it was the Irish accent I couldn't take to? I have seen Colin in some decent flicks, but his original-self didn't blend so well with the other characters.
The characters of both Walken and Sam Rockwell give this movie the psychotic premise the critics are labelling it as. The comedic performance from Rockwell is the highlight of a movie narrated so well by Farrell, but I simply didn't fancy is performance. The bloody graphics and Harrelson's bipolar villain is enough to convince you.
This might sound crazy but the movie appeared made up the longer it went on. I felt that way because it was that crazy. The wonderful concept is yet again the dark and twisted humour, offering some cracking dialogue between certain characters, particularly Hans who, behind his criminal lifestyle cares for his cancer stricken wife.
Overall: Seven Psychopaths is one of the most surprisingly enjoyable movies of 2012. With quite an original concept, and a fine cast of veterans, it is a nice send off to what has been a fantastic year at the movies.
Rise Of The Guardians rekindles the imagination we thought we had lost
In a world outside of the norm, the North Pole to be exact, Santa and affiliates are forced to regroup in a bid to prevent the Boogieman from taking over the world. The only problem is they ain't strong enough; introducing Jack Frost to help the rise of the guardians!
Dreamworks creates yet another fantastic animation that shows once again Disney does not rule the imagination of the audience.
Jack Frost (Chris Pine) is bewildered to the fact he possesses a rare power, although it becomes a point of acceptance 300 years later. Given to him by the moon, his perks involve invisibility, flying and to pretty much turn everything to ice. However Jack is part of a collection of guardians but doesn't know it yet.
The North Pole is home to North aka Santa (Alec Baldwin). North is the Leader of the guardians; Tooth (Isla Fisher), Bunny (Hugh Jackman) and the Sandman who all thrive on making the lives of children very happy. However when Pitch (boogieman) played by Jude Law shows up, a year by year agenda of celebrations take a turn for the worse as he sets on vanishing any such beliefs in the guardians, creating an impact of nightmares for the children. It is then that the "Moon" decides to invite Jack Frost as the new guardian in a bid to save the world from utter darkness. Much to the dislike of Bunny and Co, the guardians are forced to accept Jack as their own in a desperate fight against the dark and brilliantly humorous, Pitch.
An original tale, Rise of the Guardians is brilliantly told through the eyes of Jack Frost and other imaginative characters we have all believed in. Santa is visioned far from the jolly old fella we have all waited on Christmas eve; he holds an egotistic personality with a funny accent. Both naughty and nice, the pros of being a historic figure to children is still referenced nicely through-out. Bunny, as in the Easter bunny was my favourite character. Ironically perceived as an Australian Kangaroo, make no mistake he is a grumpy bunny and even more so when he confronts Jack in numerous altercations.
Jude Law plays a boogieman that only a child could have imagined; making Rise of The Guardians all the more appropriate. Aside from Yetties instead of Elf's, and Bunny's boomerangs instead of Eggs, this short tale is a consistent ingredient of comedy and originality with 97 minutes of wonderful CGI animation.
Overall: Rise of the Guardians is beautifully constructed with scenes that pull off with, or without 3D glasses. Just one of many animated movies this year, Rise of The guardians will stand out in terms of the originality involved.
Mortal Kombat legacy is set to return for a second season, with director Kevin Tancharoen reprising a web series that raked in more than 60 million views in 2011.
Fans of last years web-series are in for treat, with Tancharoen set to take the series back to its original concept - tournament style. With fan favourites such as Liu Kang and Ermac on board, Tancharoen reveals a nostalgic return, he said; "Fans are in for a real treat with the second season of Mortal Kombat: Legacy. With added visual effects and storylines that dive deeper into our warriors as
they make their way to the tournament, we’re taking this series to a whole new
level. I'm really looking forward to showing fans the first clip during the
Streamy Awards on February 17."
What was an unsuccessful pitch to Warner Bros in 11", Mortal Kombat: Rebirth supplied an original imagination, but it was on the brink of disperse following the online teaser. Although Tancharoen's original agenda had failed, Rebirth went viral with out-cry for a theatrical release. Failing to re-invent Mortal Kombat to the big screen, Tancharoen was giving the go-ahead to shoot a plethora of web series, leading to where we are now. However I still wouldn't rule out the possibility of an MK re-boot.
"Machinima and our audience have been eagerly awaiting the next chapter in this
series, and I’m thrilled to announce that Mortal Kombat: Legacy 2 will return to
its original home on Machinima," said Allen DeBevoise, Chairman, Co-Founder, and
CEO of Machinima
Although I am a die-hard MK fan, and with the "Legacy" failing to impress me on many occasions, Tancharoen's second pop looks set to make a significant mark and some what a redemption for what has been a mediocre adaption in 95" followed by a terrible sequel.
MK Legacy season 2 will see Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa reprise his role as Shang Tsung. Those who remember the theatrical release will have vague images of his introduction following the "Fight music"? you know, "Your soul is mine!". He was bad ass and should retain that image in February of 2013.
In the mean time, it's an MK Legacy catch-up for me.
Fans and Hollywood personalities will be taking time out today to reflect on Richard Pryor and the life he lived; leaving behind an influential path for those to follow. Just as Bill Cosby did for Richard, he did the same in his wake with comedians such as Eddie Murphy and Chris Rock to name a few. A large majority have embraced and represented the on-stage ego of Richard Pryor.
Richard carried a life of mixed montages, with multiple marriages and a media established drug addiction. However concerts such as Richard Pryor Live on the Sunset Strip (1982), Richard Pryor: Live in Concert (1979) and Richard Pryor... Here and Now (1983) created the comedic icon we fell in love with. Richard is one of the stand-out most influential comedians to ever brace a stage.
Richard is 65 today. Happy Birthday and RIP (1940 - 2005)
Elissa (Jennifer Lawrence) is the first to find conspicuous events surrounding the landscape of their new home and the rural town within. Her mother Sarah (Elisabeth Shue) is desperate to remain optimistic and sees it a fresh start.
Elissa is more than helpful after learning a murder had occurred in their new home, leading to flirty chats between herself and ideal genre heartthrob Ryan (Max Thieriot) - the son and last remaining member of the murdered family. The suspect is Ryan's younger sister who has not been seen since the killing. While a myth of sister lurks the backyard of the woods, we see Ryan is holding her on basement arrest.
With the plot praying on a routine escape from the enslaved sister, most of the movie focuses on a developing relationship between Elissa and Ryan. The film gets to the point where you forget there is a girl being starved in Ryan's basement. The movies backbone is depending on the occasional fright from the sister while trying to balance a chemistry of love that blends together like Tabasco and tea!
The majority of the film was rubbish as the Gremlins offers a more suspenseful taste than this.
With an old school introduction that was quite pleasing on the eye, the majority of the film was rubbish. The twist at the end does not make up for the first 95 minutes. The Gremlins offers a more suspenseful taste than this
Overall; a mundane attempt at a tiring genre. Another cheap concept involving suspense and characters that where downright careless. Wait for Sinister!
The release of Twilight Breaking Dawn - Part 2 can only call for one thing - celebration. Cinema-goers around the globe will be celebrating the end of a terrible franchise, for now. However there is a large minority who will probably shed a tear while they try and get to grip with life after Edward. So before I can truly celebrate, an important review is beyond my eager finger tips; Breaking Dawn part 2, or as the french would say, part deux.
Life in the Cullen house is no different, well, beside from a reformed Bella (Kristen Stewart) and the kid she shares with Edward (Robert Pattinson). Vampires and wolves go about there day to day mundane lives as life in the woods is just never ending (literally).
It's an introduction to soft, yet twisted music as we are thrown into the bond that both Bella and Edward share. We learn the once bookish sweetheart is now a greedy blood sucker (that's my girl!). Although many of lifes ambitions are now at her advantage, Bella is yet to control her thirst for blood as she fights to avoid the hunger for humans. This comes as a disadvantage to her as Jacob (Taylor Lautner) is guarding Bella's daughter Renesmee (Mackenzie Foy) in fear of Bella's thirst. However the Cullen house is never dull for long as the relationship between Bella, Jacob and Edward form a family unit that focuses on what is best for Renesmee; who is half human half vampire (apparently that's extraordinary).
A plot we have seen once too many in the franchise arrives at our door, snapping the letterbox in desperate need to sell us something. When a false accusation gets back to the Volturi, the affiliation is sent into panic. They believe a child like Enesmee will damage the existence of the Vampire race beliveing she holds a unique power that is not worth the risk. Leader of the Volturi, Jasper (Jackson Rathbone) is determined for answers and leads the cult toward Bella and the Cullen family. While there is only so many happy montages we can take in a Twilight flick, enough is enough as word gets back to the house concerning the safety of Enesmee. Edward an co begin to recruit Vampire families from around the way to support an possibly fight against the Volturi.
The majority of Breaking Dawn part 2 is a round up of silly sequences between Jacob, Bella and Enesmee as we get a glimpse of Edward's ridiculous attempt for a smile every so often. The movie begs for interest with the introduction of the Volturi, but you just know that even the antagonist will have no impact in this follow-up. Twilight continues to centre around a fake romance that involvs everyone; family, friends, vampires, wolves, the lack of chemistry as well as acting skills is down right disgusting.
This review is analysed by a movie fanatic so I look for aspects in every film, good and bad. They say a males perspective of Twilight will always differ from that of females, but I understand what the entire franchise has tried to offer; imagination, romance, masculinity and a tear-jerking plot. If you are looking for what I have listed, you will not find it in Twilight because if you are judging the movie for what it truly is you will know it is a story taken from a book. The fantasy novel held the responsibility of a good possible story line, however the onscreen adaption has failed upon two vital ingredients; acceptable acting and acceptable plot. I failed to accept either.
In my Breaking Dawn review I said the previous flicks are mundane and sometimes quite bearable. I then followed up on saying I might regret saying that. I do. However my honesty will still prevail and will admit to saying that the original Twilight is not all that bad (I might regret saying that). Just like the one previous, Twilight continued to offer nothing new with the same irrelevant characters (and actors) with a plot that just spells laziness and quite silly and hilariously boring.
I said the same with the BD part 1 review; "I would fail to understand why twlights' biggest fanatics could even enjoy this
trash" (echo)
Overall: A less than half decent ending could not change my consensus. It is a terrible film in every way shape or form. Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are more irritating than ever. Just like it's predecessors, Twilight Breaking Dawn part 2 is hopeless!
Following 8 episodes of sheer delight, we eagerly sat around the house browsing the TV series category of Netflix. Why? well, let's just say things haven't been the same since Walter Heisenberg deserted us once again. However, it delights the "Curious" blog to reveal Empire's latest podcast. Empire got a hold of Bryan Cranston for a Breaking bad podcast special. A 30 minute reflection on the first four seasons with the man himself. The link below will take you to the Christmas present Empire has so gratefully given us.
Warner Bros have confirmed quite an unlikely reboot. Thankfully, for fans of the roughed up series, Mortal Kombat is back in the pipeline with a generous budget at hand. Mind-set on a new bloody adaption of the cult-classical video game, Warner Bros executive Lance Sloan is hopeful with their appointed director; “We're preparing right now for the film withKevin Tancharoen, [who] directed the digital series for us"
While the success of the video games are welcomed more than the majority of fighting games of that genre, some might say the movie adaption, Mortal Kombat (1995) was not all that great. However it is a debate I am willing to challenge because in terms of effort as well as the history concerning game to movie conversions, Mortal Kombat tops the lot of them. Nit-picking at such a fine attempt is unfortunate, however Christopher Lambert' Raiden and Robin Shou as Lui Kang was quite the entertainment, not forgetting the fight scenes; that somehow managed to flow without the use of human decapitation.
The sequel, MK Annihilation, was well and truly Annihilated! For more entertaining news see my MovieNewz.
For more on the Mortal Kombat reboot see Total Film.
Let's touch on something different here at Gerry's reviews. As an Arsenal fan I have been optimistic for the team at the worst of times, an yet I feel I have betrayed myself for even considering such optimism. All I ever wanted was to convince myself of the positivity within the current squad. The act of team spirit was witnessed on October 30th when Jason Roberts made our defence look like a back four of that guy from the cheese string add, you know, the cheese string? anyway it was a Capital cup match with nervous giggles. We fought back with Reading fighting even stronger. Sure, we had a weak team, (Arsene's philosophy, sigh). I mean any team with Chamakh leading the fore front is far from threatening, however even he scored two goals trying desperately to convince us he isn't the depressed camel he makes out to be! A fine tally of strikes concluded a 7-5 victory. "It may be one of my greatest victories during my time here," said Wenger.
It's about making a statement: Arsenal Vs Manchester United. It had the potential to be a bold game and at times, regarding Van Persie's move, it was quite predictable. However, somewere in the back of my mind I felt like the team had to go out there and prove to the fans that Arsene Wenger isn't crazy and that we have the potential to at least pretend Van Persie was never there. Sadly the potential is not in the team, as it rarely was when Robin was there. The result on Saturday didn't prove much while the play and some of the the managers decisions where absolutely laughable. Arsene's stubbornness is a factor we as Arsenal fans have grown to accept, however the line-up on Saturday was far from acceptable.
Take Theo Walcott and all this talk about extending his contract. I was quite reluctant to see that happen myself, but seeing Walcott play against Reading I figured we are gonna need this guy. Arsene had every opportunity to repay Theo's contribution by starting him against United but he didn't. Instead he played Ramsey, who to my knowledge is more comfortable in centre midfield no?. We needed pace against such a skilled Ferguson creation and we didn't have it. The only bit of pace we had was sitting on the bench. Don't get me wrong, Ramsey is coming on (slowly) but not quick enough to jump Theo.
Achilles heel: Just when we thought the whole Steve Bould jibe was coming on, an unlikely individual had a serious dose of laxy-daisy; Thomas Vermaelen. However we can accept a bad game from him once in a blue moon, it was the sight of Andre Santos that really had me asking questions. No doubt if Kieran Gibbs was available he would have played; a lad with pace for days. Instead we had Santos, and again we watched as a better choice looked on from the bench, Carl Jenkinson. So what was the result of Andre's input? zilch! The over-weighted Brazilian will be having nightmares for weeks about Antonio Valencia. The experience is there, however the knowledge of position, track-back and basic defending isn't. I am beginning to wonder whether this lad was ever a defender.
If amateur defence wasn't enough, we were asked to put our trust in strikers Olivier Giroud and club flop Lukas Podolski, who to be quite frank the German International was anonymous all game. Are these not questions that we need to nail down? I mean Arsene Wenger, giving his and Arsenals history against united, chose to play the wrong players, and not for the first time.
A bitter pill to swallow: Let's go cliche on this one. Written in the stars, and so it was as Van Persie came home to break our hearts. (Like they weren't already broke...Robin, it hurts.). From the off, two minutes to be precise, it was destined to happen and the "Traitor" deserves it! It was never a problem who or how United would score, but the response we would give back. Minor additions such as Jack Wilshere was a joy to watch however he was always going to be a liability, and damaged our hopes he sure did. Reflecting back to team selection, Wilshere should have still been on the bench while Ramsey takes his position while Walcott takes Ramsey's. Simple and probably more affective. Oh, and we would maybe have Wilshere available for a steady 90 minutes against Fulham this weekend.
So what are the repercussions of Wenger's decisions? another player down and out for stupidity, and a more damaged and even more unpredictable presence of strikers. I can't help but touch on Marouane Chamakh; a guy that I would have expected to go out on loan instead of Nicklas Bendtner. However, he didn't and what he did do was guide us through what would have been a show case of embarrassment and serious Wenger backlash if we lost against Reading. Wenger talks of a confidence boost for the Moroccan striker so why didn't he at least consider him ahead of Giroud on Saturday? I mean Giroud is hardly coming off great goal form, and to be fair, Chamakh is. It is quite logical and the fans want to see goals. It seems it is about proving a point from Wenger. He wants the fans to believe in our latest additions, such as the signing of Giroud, Santos and Podolski. Surely a change of form means a change of player? Hence the depressed camel. (Sorry Chamakh). When Wenger seen the distraught faces in the Arsenal stand he poured more salt into the wounds by bringing on Arshavin "here here"!
We have seen before, one man can't win us trophies. Hats off to Santi Carzola, who in truth has so far show cased what Arsenal football club is supposed to be about. Unfortunately for him, he will be used to full extent and taking advantage of. Why? well, he continues play to his abilities and looks like the only one mind-set on scoring. I hope that is not the case, however he is one of very few midfield play makers that will be used in and out until the guy gets injured.
What now? Strive on potential and continue to believe in the current squad. We have no choice. Manchester United was never going to be an easy game, so we need to regroup. However the choice of players from Arsene Wenger is crucial. Heck why not answer Theo's question by actually sticking him up front? see how it goes. At the moment we have every right to rotate strikers because Giroud, at the moment, is unreliable. I think we can all trust he will get there, but it is now we want the points because Manchester is running miles and we would like the title!
There have already been ramifications from Wenger and his silly choice of tactics, and last year's 8-2 is just the tip of the ice-berg in fact a tease on what our conclusion could be if we don't show desire against Fulham and so on. If a revival of belief is needed, we should buy in January. We need to show we are here to compete. It is no good Wenger telling us about the future. The future is now. We need to grab it before we are once again asking questions in next summers tabloids.
COME ON THE GUNNERS!
The Video below sums up the stupidity and utter shambles of some of our players. why don't you just shove "a dagger through my heart" Santos"?
Daniel Craig returns as Bond, James Bond in Skyfall; the third in Daniel Craig's realistic portrayal of a world supporting guns, gadgets, villains, loose women and Judy Dench's M.
Stepping up to the plate is Sam Mendes; the third director in the modern franchise. I have not seen the previous two nor am I a James Bond connoisseur. However I went into this movie with an open mind as I rode the same bandwagon as anyone else in terms of expectations.
Skyfall hits the ground running with exhilarating pace as we are introduced to James Bond (Daniel Craig), who is hot on the trails of a former agent who, like a majority of bogies are involved in terrorist activity across the globe. However, an act of retrieval goes wrong as Bond is caught up in a high speed scuffle and mistakenly shot by rookie agent Eve (Naomie Harris). The incident sees Bond disappear and declared dead.
Pulling the strings behind MI6 is M (Judi Dench) and associate Gareth (Ralph Fiennes) who are facing fierce criticism from the prime minister in relation to their anonymous actions and private missions associated with the agents within the high-profile organisation. While it would seem Bond's death could benefit M16 in terms of the media frenzy, it isn't long before they reunite in a resurrection that sees M doubting the once skilled James Bond. With echoes of Gareth labelling Bond a liability, M is reluctant but needs Bond to investigate a series of threats surrounding MI6, with fingers pointing at one specialised culprit, Silva (Javier Bardem), the man behind the curtain.
A touch clever than Bond and co could have expected, Silva keeps the iconic agent on his toes as Bond is destined to meet the mysterious Silva in what becomes a more personal status that could damage the reputation of M and everything she built around James Bond.
Skyfall is a refreshing take on what the critics labelled its predecessors; Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace as "acceptable". The introduction is a wonderful taste of brutal and ecstatic action scenes that soon follow. Sam Mendes's product is a realistic dumbed-down portrayal of an agent who was once at the top and had to fall to really find himself; it's a simple story which was pretty dramatic, direct and very effective.
The James Bond franchise had parodies over the years and rightly so if you look at the plethora of different Bond concepts. If fans of the previous twenty movies expect a similar creation, I think they will be slightly disappointed. However Skyfall does reference numerous subjects, past characters and products relating to Bond's movie history.
Although the return of Q (Ben Whishaw) can be highly significant to some, the gadget concept is pretty much deceased in Skyfall which is not such a bad thing in terms of the grittiness and realism surrounding the seriousness of the plot. However the action scenes are brilliantly shot, while the movie offers some of the best acting performances of the lot; Javier Bardem who plays a terrific villain once again. Javier's on screen presence would send shivers down the back of anyone. Both Daniel Craig and Javier Bardem developed a wonderful chemistry even though the presence of Javier is not seen through-out the events of Skyfall.
Although the hype surrounding Skyfall was ridiculous first off, I can understand why because Daniel Craig's reprisal as James Bond is tremendous, supporting a production of great quality with the door left open for a return of the same entertainment. For me however, Javier Bardem steals the show, who introduced that "Ledger Joker" maniac character with a consensus that only he knows will end. The female presence in the movie was not highly significant and at times quite irrelevant, unless you are the charming Judy Dench. It qualifies successfully with the presence of the female characters. Your attention is more so turned to acknowledge the introduction of Javier Bardem; a fine one it turns out to be.
Overall; Skyfall is a delightful resemblance to Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy. Daniel Craig can do no wrong as special agent Bond. Just as Nolan did, Sam Mendes provided a Bond reprisal with tremendous action scenes and the ingredients of modern drama. However the final consensus of Skyfall would not have been greatly positive without Javier's demented character, Silva.
Lenny Abrahamson is known for mastering the independent classic, Adam and Paul (2005). He looks to grab your attention to a different topic, one that we know all too well. The concept is one of considerable debate as we follow Richard (Jack Reynor) and his "Molly coddled" lifestyle made up of happy families, true friendship and desperate love.
Richard lives a charming life with wealthy backgrounds; he spends his summer days with a group of friends having the "craic" in the family beach home. With his charming personality he sets his sights on Laura (Roisin Murphy) who to his unfortunate circumstance is partly tied up with Connor (Sam Keeley).
The calm before the storm is numerous images and silent embarks of Richard reminiscing at his beach home, driving his car, eating cereal and smoking silently as Richard stares into oblivion in almost every shot. It all got so boring first off I began to believe all of these activities are what Richard actually did, but no. Richard starts to believe in his charm after numerous dates and gossip has gotten him closer to Laura, however the dramatic portrayal of the movie finally kicks in when an argument outside a party involves himself and Connor, leaving Connor well, ultimately dead.
The suspense and the dramatic follow up is what makes the first half feel terrible to the second half, and unfortunately it is. We see the acting skills from numerous actors including Jack Reynor and his father Peter (Lars Mikkelsen), who both create probably the only seen worth remembering.
The problem with this film is not the acting, but the plot was so weak, and ran at such a slow pace. Maybe it was my own fault for building my hype for, well, such a hyped film. A movie that was quite short in 87 minutes and did not have enough input to develop any characters resulting in a lack of emotion for such a serious concept.
Lenny's latest flick touches off a very important subject, just like he did with Adam and Paul, but besides from the incident that took so long to get to, a message that was supposed to be sent out kind of went in no direction. However he hit the nail on the head with creating a stereotype within Richard and his friends; Slightly posh rugby heads who drive daddy's car and wear tight T shirts with grey tracksuit bottoms. As he created that stereotypical ego of Richard, a harsh reality surrounds him as he, just like any real human being would, comes crashing down to earth after realising the reality and possible consequences surrounding his stupidity.
Overall; beautifully shot no doubt, but really slow on developing a lack of emotion and dull scenes of practically nothing. However Jack Reynor gives a performance that does convince you of an enjoyable portrayal of character, but not the film.
As we continue to celebrate Halloween, let's look at another classic of the 70's; a year in which most original concepts of horror had come about.
Released in 1976, Carrie is a tale of vulnerability at the highest as we follow the path of Carrie (Sissy Spacek); a reclusive high-school student who through-out has had her fair share of incidents regarding her lonely persona which seems to attract malicious bullys.
Not much help in her troubled life is her mother Margaret (Piper Laurie) who has strong, sadistic religious beliefs. The controlled paranoia of Carrie's mother is particularly seen when she features in one of many sinister moments between mother and daughter; Carrie is sent home early due to a scene in the schools showers when she freaks out after getting her first period, attracting the attention of heartless students to laugh and throw things at her. (Yep, quite sad really).
Margaret can only see her daughters situation as a sin, while constantly revealing her regrettable desire of killing Carrie as a child. Margaret condones intimate relations, viewing such an act as extremely sinful.
While Carrie is sometimes forced into repeating her mothers religious chants and locked in the "Sin" room for forgiveness, Carrie begins to notice a telekinetic change in her mind, revealing an extraction of movements and powerful forces.
While not fully understanding the sheer power behind this, it is when Carrie is suddenly asked to the dance by Tommy Ross (William Katt). Carrie mistakenly sees this a glorious opportunity to be accepted and for once in her life, sociable. However the events concerning Carrie and a minority of bully's change the course of her haunting ability.
From start to finish Carrie offers an original spookish concept of ones desire and utter portrayal that leads a reclusive to believe in sociability outside the home her mother continues to rule. The constant Psycho resemblance is seen through-out an plays a wonderful tribute to Hitchcock's masterpiece, referencing the "Eeek" almost slash sounds occurring through-out the films time line.
Directed by Brian De Palma, with Stephen King's novel at hand, Brian creates a fantastic jerk of back-forward scenes that involve Carrie at the happiest of times, even though you know deep down this girl is tormented by pretty much everyone surrounding her. The terrifying jingles of emotions are heard and witnessed by Carrie alone in her bedroom, then a couple of brief reflections of the teens in high-school who are truly enjoying themselves but oblivious to Carries haunting presence.
I was quite surprised to see a goofy John Travolta appearance. He plays Billy Nolan; a puppet alongside high-school popularity queen Chris (Nancy Allen) who some might know as Murphy, aka Robocop's annoying partner. It is more so the antics of Chris who is hell bound on destroying further-more the reputation of Carrie.
The haunting element of this classic are carried out by the freakish chemistry between Carrie and her brain-washed mother. Although the finale results in a memorable cinematic climax, you never forget the performances from both Sissy Spacek and onscreen next of kin, Piper Laurie.
Overall; Another horror classic that leaves a frightening taste before bed. If it isn't the conclusion of this short masterpiece that gets you, it will be the onscreen performance of Carrie's mother that will stay with you for a very long time.
John Carpenter's suspenseful masterpiece consisted of some real quality, cold blooded quotes. Quite simple ones also, and very misleading to the eyes of some; Tommy - " Laurie, what's the boogieman? Laurie - "There's no such thing."
How wrong was Jamie Lee Curtis's vulnerable high school sweetheart to think that. 1978 brought absolute terror to cinema-goers around the world. A good ten years before my time, Halloween night never appealed to me very much, however the video tape of Carpenters classic, in which was kept hidden from me for years due to child-hood trauma, the creation of sheer terror was really upon me the day I watched it. (I was brave, but not enough to watch it at night)
The quiet suburban neighbourhood of Haddonfield was about to become quite an iconic scene; a young Michael Myers is about to lay the path for a dramatic return to his home town 15 years later.
Only 6 years old, nobody knew what drove the mind of such a young boy. His dark and twisted mind would drive him to stab his 16 year old sister, carving a whole new perspective to the way the town would celebrate Halloween.
Institutionalised for almost 15 years, Michael Myers escapes the outskirts of Illinois as he makes his way back home, hoping to arrive on a very convenient date; October 31st, 1978, Halloween.
Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) is your stereotypical book worm slash high school virgin who chooses babysitting over drunken nights any day of the week. Softly spoken and well behaved, she is unaware of the danger about to curse Haddonfield that very night.
Michael Myers, played by Tony Moran is off the grid, however it is the introduction of his doctor, Sam Loomis (Donald Pleasence) that makes the night a nerve wrecking cat and mouse chase as he seeks to find Myers before he reeks havoc in Haddonfield. Desperate for assistance, Loomis contacts Sheriff Leigh Brackett (Charles Cyphers) to warn him of Michael's presence to be, believing that Michale will reenact the murder of 1963.
Dr Loomis - I met this six-year-old child, with this blank, pale, emotionless face and, the blackest eyes... the devil's eyes."
Sheriff Brackett is not fully convinced of Sam's accusations, however it is no convenience of the friendship between his daughter Annie (Nancy Kyes) and Michael's target, Laurie.
A series of events leads to the category of classics Halloween will forever remain. When Loomis finds out Michael's motive for escape, he is hell bound on preventing the murder of another family connection, Laurie Strode, who is oblivious to any past the psycothic killer had created.
Hot on the trail of Michael, Loomis is adamant to get in contact with Laurie as she spends her Halloween night babysitting Tommy Doyle (Brian Andrews). However it is not all horror movies and pumpkin making as Laurie converts into survival mode as when Tommy told her he had seen the boogieman previously, she should have believed him.
My favourite horror movie, if you want to call it horror? unlike a majority of Horrors of that era, Halloween was so original in terms of frightening you with nothing other than suspense. John Carpenter did not need a truck full of fake blood to convince the audience of the dangers of someone with a psycothic frame of mind. A simple concept; an average joe in a Captain Kirk mask. Let's not forget the anticipation of the classic theme tune which proved another simple way of terrifying the audience without revealing anything.
Halloween is also one of the originals to introduce what lurks in the background. Like I said, Michael Myers is an average Joe with a twisted heart. The concept of someone watching you, but yet not knowing, will always give me goose bumps. Of course a lot of movies are created on the monsters of our dreams, and done it so well, but Halloween will always frighten me with its short, yet mediocre plot that proves a possibility along with a more realistic chance of being stalked by the unknown.
In so many parts of this movie, Loomis sums up what he is feeling, and somehow you believe in his disturbia, hoping his presence will prevent the horror that eventually follows.
Dr Loomis - "I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up because I realised what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply... evil."
The acting is mundane but acceptable. Jamie Lee Curtis was so amateur in this movie but some how I believe there could have been no other. The sequels, threequels etc that would follow eventually made Laurie strode out to be some sort of "Sarah Connor" when in fact the original shows the conversion of vulnerability to survival mode that leads to a dramatic conclusion in the film. However it was not fully a bad thing they opened the door for a sequel, I enjoyed the follow up, but the rest were pure garbage. In fact I think it is sometimes fun to watch the apparent trilogy to really embrace how much a qualitative piece of work John Carpenter created back in 1978.
Overall; John Carpenters Halloween is and always will be one of the best horror/suspenseful thrillers ever made. Along with The Thing and Psycho, this can not be missed come October 31st.
Recently, I've come to the realisation that Heavy
Metal Mouth hasn't yet featured any TV articles so expect to be
reading about the likes of The Sopranos, The Wire and Lost starting
now as we list off our favourite episodes and characters on the
silver screen.
To kick it all off theres no better place to
start than with Walter White, Jesse Pinkman and AMC's astounding
drama Breaking Bad, which recently concluded at the half way point of
it's fifth and final season. We'll have to wait another year for it's
return, but until then let's remember the reasons we love it so much
in the first place. Here are Heavy Metal Mouth's Top 15 Breaking Bad
Episodes.WARNING:
For anyone who hasn't seen the show in full (that is to Season 5,
Episode 8 at this point) do not continue. This article contains
massive spoilers. 15.
Breaking Bad (S1, E1)The
debut episode of the show opened with a memorable sequence involving
Walter speeding down the motorway in an RV loaded with chemicals as
he is pursued by sirens and records a tearful message to his family.
It's a remarkable opening and from there we are introduced to the
mundane life Walter lives with his beloved and heavily pregnant wife
Skyler, and teenage son Walt Jr. who suffers from cerebal palsy.
Walt's terminal diagnosis leads him to embark on a dangerous scheme
involving troubled former pupil Jesse Pinkman and so Walt begins his
new double life as crystal meth manufacturer, albeit comically
unsuccessfully at first.
The pilot is an excellent
demonstration of the mix of black comedy with drama and serves as a
terrific starting point which the show quickly developed on. 14.
Dead
Freight (S5, E5)The
first of many highlights from the incredible fifth season, this
episode sees Walt, Jesse and Mike carry out a train heist for
chemicals that goes to plan until a passing boy witnesses the robbery
and is duly executed by new recruit Todd. Other highlights of the
episode include Walter installing a bug in Hank's office as he
deviously cries to his brother in law to create a diversion. An
action packed finale with a shocking conclusion.
13.
4 Days Out (S4, E9)The
first of several so called 'bottle' episodes in the show, and in my
opinion, the best. Walt's deteriorating condition and lack of
substantial money to leave behind leads him to bring Jesse deep into
the desert for a marathon cook, only for the RV to die on the pair,
leaving them stranded. An episode that developed the relationship
between the pair and the first real indication of a father/son bond
that would later become clearer.
12.
Peekaboo (S2, E6)An
episode which significantly developed the character of Jesse as he is
faced with the task of reclaiming stolen drug money from two meth
addicts following their ambush of Skinny Pete. Jesse comes to realise
he's not the tough enforcer he is expected to be, and forms a strange
bond with the junkie couples child. The first time we see a truly
empathetic side to Jesse and a real breakthrough for Aaron Paul as an
actor in the series.
11.
Hermanos (S4, E8)Simply
a showcase for the acting powerhouse that is Giancarlo Eposito as we
are given further insight into the past of fast food empire and drug
kingpin Gus Fring through a series of flashbacks involving his
dealings with the cartel. Mark Margolis is excellent as the
despicible Tio but it's Eposito who steals the show, and it is a true
testament to his ability that he could generate sympathy from an
audience who already knew his evil nature all too well.
10. Live
Free Or Die (S5, E1)The
remarkable opening flash forward scene of season 5's inaugral episode
is enough to ensure Live Free Or Die's position among the great
episodes of the series, but this episode is notable for it's complex
examination of Walt's character as he begins to transform into the
monster he destroyed in the season 4 finale, Gus Fring. Walt's hunger
for power and status has outgrown his love of family and he is no
longer in need of money. He is simply a different man than the
bumbling, desperate but kind-hearted teacher we met in the pilot
episode and Live Free Or Die is confirmation of Walt's dominant alter
ego. Anna Gunn is superb as Skyler, who is horrified at her
realisation of Walt's change.
9.
Box Cutter (S4, E1)The
season 4 opener is once again dominated by one man's performance;
Giancarlo Eposito is mesmerizing as Gus makes a menacing statement to
both Walt and Jesse following the murder of Gale. His execution of
Victor before their eyes is brutal, and Eposito's cold, silent
demeanour is chilling and makes for one of the most intense scenes in
the show's history.
From writer Zoe Kazan and also starring in, comes a clever movie based on the would-be imagination of a not-so constructed novelist Calvin, played by the populated growth of (Paul Dano), who struggles to evolve from a "writers block" following a successful novel he wrote in college.
Far from social, Calvin lives with his dog and his type writer. While continuing to gain recognition through a book he wrote in his teens, he struggles to cope with handling routine lectures as well as constant pressure in terms of an eagerly anticipated follow up to a book that he is forever recognised with.
While Calvin crumbles under the pressure of staring blank at his type writer, it is when Dr. Rosenthal (Elliott Gould) encourages Calvin to write something "Crap", anything to show his desire is still at show. Agreeing to this, Calvin finds himself writing about a girl, Ruby Sparks who he knows all too well as just a simple imagination who makes routine visits to his couch dreams. Seeing the introduction a potential ball roller, it is when Calvin wakes up one morning to find Ruby Sparks (Zoe Kazan), his creation, wandering around his apartment like nothing out of the ordinary.
In humorous circumstances, Calvin struggles to believe his eyes. Worried of what might become of his mental health, he turns to older and not much wiser brother Harry (Chris Messina) who to his surprise can also see the character of Ruby in Calvin's apartment.
Harry, who sees this a goldmine in more ways than others, Calvin believes Ruby to be the love of his life, the girlfriend of his dreams, literally. Although Ruby is every bit human as the rest of us, emotions, love, and the core of Calvin's created relationship is depending on what Calvin decides to type. It is when he settles for this ideal relationship that Calvin realises that the "will" and "desire" from the two of them may collide, revealing a level of selfishness from Calvin, taking a more serious approach further down the line.
As silly as it sounds, it does manage to provide quite a humorous and clever concept, with a story mixed with the ingredients of a mundane relationship as well as the ups and downs of life. Obviously it would be ideal for us all to control our girlfriends, but sooner or later a karma of some sort will bite us in the ass!. What Ruby Sparks does so well is focus on the drama as well as the onscreen chemistry of Paul Dano and Zoe Kazan.
As far from convincing Ruby Sparks might actually be, the film takes you to a point so far beyond fiction that you forget that Ruby was created by Calvin. A fine example is when she pleads with Calvin to meet his parents; a scene that becomes all too strange. Calvin is happy to convince his mother (Jane Anne Thomas) and her boyfriend Mort (Antonio Banderas) of his newly found relationship.
A stand out performance from Paul Dano who I am growing to love lately. His acting abilities shine brightly, as they did in Looper. His overall presence, particularly in this movie and in my opinion was made for him to represent, resulting in some fine onscreen credentials. Zoe Kazan is also a joy to watch as she plays whatever she has to because after all, she is a puppet awaiting Calvin's fingertips.
Overall: Ruby Sparks was definitely one of the surprise flicks of the year. A clever, Indie premise supplied with comedic humour, drama, romance and heartbreak; not to mention Paul Dano turning in a stellar performance.
Sinister is written and directed by Scott Derrickson, who judging by his resume, this guy loves his horror movies; that I don't have a problem with! I was really looking forward to this flick for two reasons; Insidious was one of my favourite horror movies of the last ten years, so my anticipation grew with the production of Sinister carrying the same producer. And B, prior to seeing Sinister, I watched "House at the End of the street" which left me desperate for something fresh.
Ellison (Ethan Hawke) is an accomplished writer who brews his career through the premise of true-crime stories. His obsession is based on the majority of murders and mysteries surrounding them with a weight of controversy surrounding his Journalistic morals.
Ellison is hell bent on reaching a peak he is yet to discover in his career while trying to convince himself of the stories he covers are for the people, and not for fame. It is no convenience when he moves his family into their new home, a suburban crime scene; a freakish killing spree that resulted in the hanging of an entire family. Desperate for his big break, Ellison has to manage the Ora surrounding the town and its unspoken crime and his wife Tracy (Juliet Rylance) who is convinced of a refreshing start to a troubled past.
Although the Sheriff (Fred Dalton Thompson) voiced his own opinion on Ellison's reputation, it doesn't stop the willingness behind Ellison's personality as he stumbles across a box of horrific surprises that hold a motive behind his current investigation.
Without hesitation, Ellison puts the mysterious reel of tapes together as he is disturbed but yet satisfied to witness a plethora of found-footage images that take him on a journey through a nightmare worse than he could have imagined.
Desperate to fulfil is unwanted duties, Ellison discovers a dark figure within the murders; a supernatural spirit that haunts those who discover the tapes.
Ellison's insight into the murders reveal an origin of secrets that is sure to shock the town as he believes, in cliche journalistic fashion, "the people must to know". Although Ellison is not prepared for the danger he could place on his wife and kids as a demon lurks behind his projector of evidence.
Judging a book by its cover is not my thing, but by its introduction, that is how I roll!. On the off, Sinister invites you down a dark and twisted path, most likely a journey that you will have never witnessed before. The first scene reveals a taste of refreshing initiative. Originality is not the main key to Sinister because to be blunt, it ain't original, but it is really scary.
The main premise is the constant suspense that is revealed within the tapes. It is not graphically gory, just down right disturbing with each video backed up with a frightening tune. Just like Paranormal Activity, the majority of scares are within the backing of found-footage. But apart from the mundane routine events in 21st century horror movies, Sinister succeeds in disturbing the mind of the viewer without actual "Jump-Scares".
The plot is fascinating in it's own sick way, following a puzzle that I had no idea how it would come together, but it did, and it did so in original fashion.
Looking at the majority of Horrors this year, it is obvious to label Sinister as the best and certainly the scariest movie of 2012 thus far. I adore my horror movies so I was quite satisfied with a concept that is not entirely fresh, but revealed scenes with simple ideas and found a way of visually implanting an image into the viewers head. It is not always about the full on graphic that disturbs the mind, it is the motive behind it that really gets the viewers asking questions, and better yet, remembering something that almost feels a supernatural reality.
Overall; Not entirely original with the folks behind the scenes nit-picking at Insidious and Paranormal Activity. However, the overall creation of horror is really frightening, with scenes that some viewers may find disturbing. Sinister is a successful result of a genre that has unfortunately been the subject of poor and effortless movies lately. Halloween is approaching, don't hesitate with this one!
Joe Simmons (Levitt) is one of many cohorts affiliated with a criminal organisation running Loopers; assigned hit-men of the present who gain wealthy lifestyles through assassinating criminals who are sent from the future be shot an wiped in the outskirts of Kansas City. The organisation is altered through the use of time travel, invented in the thirty years ahead. The mob of 2074 sees the machine beneficial in terms of body disposal. Once the target is sent back to the year 2044, it is placed in the hands of Joe and Co to finish the task.
Kansas is home to the strangest of folks with a major decline in poverty as well as a fascinating trend of telekinesis. Abe (Jeff Daniels) who is head of Loopers, feeds off the low class of 2044 Kansas.
To Abe's disgust, Seth (Paul Dano)lets his target slip, leaving an outcry for him to be captured. Joe hesitates in covering for Seth however he finds a portrayal to come as Seth reveals the danger of the current Loopers as a future figure head calls for all Loopers to be closed - meaning their future self is next to appear which will leave them ultimiately terminated.
Joe is faced with the ultimate task when he is faced with killing himself, Bruce Willis. Joe suffers a similar consequence to Seth as he too lets his target escape, resulting in a chase of cat and mouse involving the mob and an older but much wiser Joe.
Joe; "I work as a specialized assassin, in an outfit called the Loopers. When my organization from the future wants someone to die, they zap them back to me and I eliminate the target from the future. The only rule is: never let your target escape... even if your target is you."
Older Joe follows is on a path to destruction as he sets on seeking the "Rainmaker"; the future figure involved in closing all the Loopers. The concept is blended between a general mix of future scenes and future flashbacks if you like, painting a picture of Old Joe's life from crime to love. Destined to make his future current, Old Joe is hell bent on changing the perception of his younger self, even if it means the introduction of Sarah (Emily Blunt). Sarah is caught up in a convenient piece to a time travelling puzzle.
Looper begins at great pace, offering a classic ingredient of science fiction, a genre we have recently come to forget. It is obvious to see the comparison of movies such as The Matrix, but it should take pride in enhancing its own premise. Time travel has been done before but not like this. Looper took this concept and kept focus keeping any possible exaggeration in tact.
The onscreen chemistry between Willis and Levitt is delightful. It is when they both sit across from each other for the first time you realise the hype surrounding Joseph's Die-hard resemblance. The interactions between Joe and Sarah shine nicely as it took aim in slowing down the movie, focusing on what is a potential romance that intervenes in what feels like an appropriate time.
Looper is an intelligent movie, creating some what a less confusing direction towards what many people believe time travel to be quite mindless, Inception and Donnie Darko are examples of showcasing a timetravel premise. Both fantastic films in their own way, although it still takes me some time to get to grips with the apparent aim of those movies. Inception was known for it's mind boggling asset, leaving Nolan to let the viewer decide.Let's just say you can enjoy Looper without any long-term debates.
Is it what the critics say; 2012's Matrix? No, I believe Inception was 2010's Matrix, and you can't have a film every year relating to the same film can we?
Director Rian Johnson made this movie his own, just like when Nolan got a hold of Inception. Not many directors and writers succeed in creating a time travel concept following the success of previous creations, however Rian has put together something original, with a not-so original cast, and made what could be my film of the year thus far.
Overall: Not only do the performances from Levitt and Willis make this enjoyable, the all round dark and twisted concept rates this as one of the best sci-fi thrillers of the last 10 years! It rocked!
